Elektrik- Elektronik Mühendisliği Lisans Diploması

 ISCO:08

 ISCO:08

1. To be able to analyse and design electrical and electronics engineering related subjects,

2. To be able to use hardware and software related to the profession effectively,

3. Has the ability to follow the developments related to his/her profession and has the awareness of lifelong learning,

4. Prone to individual and group work, developed sense of responsibility, professional ethical awareness,

5. Strong social skills and self-confidence,

6. To train Electrical-Electronics engineers who are fluent in at least one foreign language in order to follow the developments and publications on technical issues.

Education and training is carried out in the form of formal education. In addition, practical training is carried out as internship or workplace training in laboratories and workshops within higher education institutions or in industry, health institutions and workplaces.

• Knowledge of mathematics, science, basic engineering, computing and related discipline-specific topics; ability to apply this knowledge in solving complex engineering problems.
• Ability to identify, formulate and analyze complex engineering problems using fundamental knowledge of science, mathematics and engineering, and considering the UN Sustainable Development Goals relevant to the problem at hand.
• Ability to design creative solutions to complex engineering problems; ability to design complex systems, processes, devices or products to meet current and future requirements, taking into account realistic constraints and conditions.
• Ability to select and use appropriate techniques, resources, and modern engineering and information technology tools, including estimation and modeling, for the analysis and solution of complex engineering problems, recognizing their limitations.
• Ability to use research methods to investigate complex engineering problems, including literature search, designing and conducting experiments, collecting data, analyzing and interpreting results.
• Knowledge of the impacts of engineering practices on society, health and safety, economy, sustainability and environment in the context of the UN Sustainable Development Goals; awareness of the legal implications of engineering solutions.
• Knowledge about ethical responsibility, acting in accordance with engineering professional principles, awareness of ethical responsibility, acting impartially, without discrimination, and being inclusive of diversity.
• • Ability to work effectively individually and in intradisciplinary and multidisciplinary teams (face-to-face, remote or hybrid) as a team member or leader.
• Ability to communicate effectively in oral and written form on technical subjects, taking into account the various differences (education, language, profession, etc.) of the target audience.
• Knowledge of business life practices such as project management and economic feasibility analysis; awareness of entrepreneurship and innovation.
• The ability to learn independently and continuously, to adapt to new and emerging technologies and to think inquisitively about technological changes.

Has the following key competences at an advanced level.

1. Literacy competence

2. Multilingual competence

3. Mathematical competence and competence in science, technology and engineering

4. Digital competence

5. Personal, social and learning to learn competence

7. Entrepreneurial competence

8. Cultural awareness and competence of expression

1. Different methods such as homework, project, application, midterm and final exam are used in measurement and evaluation.

2. Numeric grading systems are used in the evaluation of student success.

3. Course success grade and evaluation of exams

ARTICLE 38 – (1) The success of a student in a course is determined by evaluating the mid-term grades and the final or make-up exams together.

(2) In courses with theoretical and practical together, the mid-term grades consist of the grades given for short exams, homework, projects, clinical work, fieldwork, laboratory work, reports and similar studies, at least one of which is a mid-term grade, and the effect of these grades on the course success grade is 40%, and the effect of the final or make-up exam results on the course success grade is 60%, provided that at least 60 points are received from these exams.

(3) In order for a student to be considered successful in an independent laboratory study, practice and similar, the sum of 60% of the mid-term exam and the score related to that activity and 40% of the score on the final or make-up exam must be at least 60. The score of the exam that the student does not take is zero (0).

(4) In order for a student to be considered successful in a course, the grade of the course must be at least 60 according to the 100-point grading system.

(5) In academic units that provide distance education, the evaluation rates and the course passing grade are determined according to the provisions of the directives approved by the Senate.

(6) In the mid-term evaluations; the percentages of participation in the calculation of grades of other activities, such as quizzes, examinations, homework, projects, term papers, laboratories, reports, fieldwork and similar activities, are submitted to the approval of the relevant boards of the academic units by the relevant faculty members as specified in the course information packages and, if accepted, are announced to the students via automation at the beginning of the term.

(7) The equivalent of the grades in the 4-point system is arranged according to the grade conversion table determined by the Council of Higher Education.

(8) Success grades and degrees:

Success Grade (Number) Success Grade (Letter)   Coefficient     Meaning

             90-100                             AA                           4.00              Pass

             85-89                               BA                           3.50              Pass

             75-84                               BB                           3.00               Pass

             70-74                               CB                            2.50              Pass

             60-69                               CC                            2.00              Pass

              0-59                                DC                            1.50              Fail

4. Weighted grade and weighted grade point average

ARTICLE 39 – (1) Weighted grade: The weighted grade of a course multiplied by the credits of that course is the weighted grade of that course.

(2) Term/year weighted grade point average: It is obtained by dividing the sum of the weighted grades of the student from all courses he/she registered for that term and the credit values ​​of those courses by the total credits of the same courses. The division process is carried out by two digits after the decimal point. If the third digit after the decimal point in the results is less than five, it is rounded to zero, and if it is five or more, it is rounded up and determined as two digits.

(3) General weighted grade point average: It is obtained by dividing the sum of the weighted grades of all courses taken by the student since he/she registered to the faculty or college by the total credits of the same courses. In the calculation of the general weighted grade point average, the last grade received by the student from the courses he/she repeated is taken into account.

In order to monitor the quality of higher education programs;

• YÖK is responsible for planning, organizing, managing and supervising education, training and other activities in higher education institutions.

• "University Monitoring and Evaluation Reports" of higher education institutions, prepared within the framework of the criteria determined by YÖK, are published every year. Reports prepared according to these reports, containing quantitative and qualitative evaluations for higher education institutions, are shared with the public by YÖK.

• The "Foundation Higher Education Institutions Report", which includes academic, administrative and financial data of foundation higher education institutions, is published every year by YÖK. These reports, which include quantitative and qualitative evaluations of foundation higher education institutions, are shared with the public by YÖK. Quality assurance of undergraduate programs in higher education is provided according to the "Procedures and Principles for Providing Quality Assurance of Higher Education Diploma Programs":

1. Creation and Approval of Curriculum: YÖK determines the minimum standards and criteria required for the opening of undergraduate departments and programs in higher education institutions.

1.1. The curriculum of undergraduate programs in higher education institutions and the learning outcomes that each program will bring to the student are determined by the senates of higher education institutions in accordance with the basic principles determined by YÖK on these issues.

1.2. The curriculum of National Core Education Programs is implemented by higher education institutions with the approval of YÖK after being accepted by the relevant Council of Deans.

2. Measurement-Evaluation: How the learning outcomes that each undergraduate program will provide to the student will be measured and evaluated is carried out in line with the teaching and examination regulations prepared by higher education institutions in line with the basic principles determined by YÖK.

3. Certification: Students enrolled in undergraduate programs, if they successfully complete the course credits and other obligations determined by higher education institutions; receives a bachelor's degree.

4. Self-Evaluation-External Evaluation: In the context of continuous monitoring, higher education institutions enter the "Institution Internal Evaluation Reports" of the previous year into the Information System prepared by the Higher Education Quality Board (YÖKAK) at the beginning of each year. The "Institutional Feedback Report" prepared by YÖKAK regarding the external evaluation of higher education institutions is shared with the public. In addition, accreditation decisions made by accreditation bodies authorized or recognized by YÖKAK also show that the quality assurance of the qualifications of the programs is ensured. It carries out regular review activities regarding the qualifications determined in accordance with the YÖKAK legislation.

Engineering Education Programs Evaluation and Accreditation Association (MÜDEK)

1.05.2024/30.09.2026

• There are no special admission requirements for this program.
• General admission requirements for Turkish and foreign students are valid to start the program.

1. Those who have a bachelor's degree can continue their studies in master's programmes and, if they meet the relevant requirements, in doctoral and proficiency in art programmes accepted with a bachelor's degree.

2. Undergraduate students have the right to participate in double major programmes offered by the higher education institutions where they are studying. Students enrolled in double major programmes can take courses from two diploma programmes simultaneously and if they are successful, they can receive two separate undergraduate diplomas.

1. Higher Education Law No. 2547

1.1. Regulation on the Principles of Transfer Between Associate and Undergraduate Programs in Higher Education Institutions, Double Major, Minor and Inter-Institutional Credit Transfer

1.2. Regulation on the Continuation of Undergraduate Education for Graduates of Vocational Schools and Open Education Associate Degree Programs

2. Higher Education Law No. 2547 (Additional Article-35)

2.1. Higher Education Quality Assurance and Higher Education Quality Board Regulation

Qualification is continuous